Historical Perspectives On Contemporary Issues

The DNA Papers

This podcast series illuminates the history of seminal discoveries and research through which we learned about the molecule that has been dubbed as the “secret of life” itself: DNA, or deoxyribonucleic acid.

This series progresses from the first discovery of the substance in 1869 to the late 1950s, when scientists figured out the structure of this molecule and its implications for the way in which it carries out its biological functions. Each episode features scholars and experts from different fields, including the history of science, other humanities and social sciences—such as philosophy, anthropology, sociology of science and STS—the specific areas of science pertinent to the paper being discussed, and science communication.

Click on the “Resources” tab for information for researchers as well as further readings.

Jump to:
Episode 1 on Friedrich Miescher and the discovery of nuclein
Episode 2 on Albrecht Kossel and the discovery of the building blocks of nuclein
Episode 3 on Walter Sutton and the relation between chromosomes and heredity
Episode 4 on Fred Griffith and the discovery of bacterial transformation
Episode 5 on Phoebus Levene, DNA chemistry and the tetranucleotide hypothesis
Episode 6 on William Astbury, Florence Bell and the first X-ray pictures of DNA
Episode 7 on Oswald Avery, Colin McLeod, and Maclyn McCarty and the chemical basis of bacterial transformation
Episode 8 on Maclyn McCarty, Oswald Avery and the enzymatic evidence for DNA as the transforming substance
Episode 9 on Erwin Chargaff and the evidence for non-uniformity of nucleotide base composition in DNA
Episode 10 on Harriet Ephrussi-Taylor, Rollin Hotchkiss and the demonstration of bacterial transformation as a general phenomenon
Episode 11 on Alfred Hershey, Martha Chase, and the conclusive evidence for the function of DNA as the material of heredity.
Episode 12 on Maurice Wilkins, Rosalind Franklin, their collaborators, and the data that supported the double helix model for DNA structure.
Episode 13 on James Watson, Francis Crick, and the DNA Double Helix.

Check back monthly for new episodes.

Photo Credit: DNA Origami. Prof. Mark Szczelkun, University of Bristol.

Neeraja Sankaran

Neeraja Sankaran introduces the series, which she organized and moderates. She is a historian of science and medicine at the National Centre for Biological Sciences-TIFR, Bangalore, India. Her work focuses on the recent and near-contemporary history of biomedical sciences. An independent scholar since 2015, she has held both research and teaching positions at universities in different parts of the world, including the United States, Egypt, South Korea, India, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands.

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed-captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded October 4, 2022



Friedrich Miescher

Image courtesy of
Wellcome Collection

The first episode of the DNA Papers goes back to the nineteenth century when a young Swiss doctoral student, searching for the secrets of life by delving into the chemistry of cells, stumbled on to a hitherto unknown new chemical substance localized in the nucleus of pus cells. He named the substance nuclein; we now recognize it by the commonly used acronym for its chemical name: DNA. Friedrich Miescher reported his discovery in “Uber Die Chemische Zusammensetzung Der Eiterzellen.” [On the chemical composition of pus cells] Medizinisch-Chemische Untersuchungen 4 (1871): 441–60.

Joining us to discuss the significance of Miescher and his discovery are:

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded January 17, 2022

Image courtesy of
Wellcome Collection

In episode 2 of the DNA Papers we discuss a cluster of papers from the late nineteenth century by the German physiological chemist Albrecht Kossel, who studied the chemical make-up of nuclein, and found and named its nitrogen-containing building blocks, probably best recognized today by their labels A, T, G, and C. Although the work was deemed sufficiently important by his contemporaries to garner him the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1910, Kossel remains a lesser known figure in the history of DNA, especially among non-German speakers. The papers featured in this discussion are:

Kossel, Albrecht. 1879. “Ueber Das Nucleïn Der Hefe.” [On the nuclein of yeast] Zeitschrift Für Physiologische Chemie 3: 284–91.
Kossel, Albrecht. 1882. “Zur Chemie Des Zellkerns.” [On the chemistry of the nuclei of cells] Zeitschrift Für Physiologische Chemie 7: 7–22.
Kossel, Albrecht. 1886. “Weitere Beiträge Zur Chemie Des Zellkerns.” [Further contributions on the chemistry of the nuclei of cells] Zeitschrift Für Physiologische Chemie 10: 248–64.

Sharing  their perspectives on the Kossel’s contributions and their importance are:

Pnina Abir-Am, Brandeis University
Mark Lorch, University of Hull
Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded on July 12, 2022.

The papers discussed in episode 3 of the DNA Papers do not mention DNA in any way at all! And yet they are vitally important in any history of DNA because they provided the first step in bringing together a visible cellular component—the chromosome—both with ideas about heredity and about the chemical workings of living cells (DNA). The two papers, by Walter Sutton, “On the Morphology of the Chromosome Group in Brachystola Magna,” and “The chromosomes in heredity,” were published in 1902 and 1903 in the journal The Biological Bulletin, in 1902 (Vol. 4 (1): 24-39)  and 1903 (Vol. 4 (5): 231-251), respectively.

Here to share their insights about the bearings of Sutton and his discoveries and thoughts on the hereditary functions of the chromosomes are:

Matthew Cobb, University of Manchester
Durgadas Kasbekar, The Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics
Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis, University of Florida

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded on on Aug 25, 2022

Episode 4 of the DNA Papers features another chapter in the deep history of DNA in which the molecule itself doesn’t come up. As in the previous episode, the paper makes no explicit reference to either the molecule or its function. But the paper occupies an indisputable role in the history of DNA, because the discovery it reports opened the door to discovery of the function of DNA as the carrier of hereditary information. Joining the discussion on “The significance of pneumococcal types” by the British microbiologist and epidemiologist Fred Griffith, The Journal of Hygiene 27 (02): 113–59; 1928) are:

Lloyd Ackert, Drexel University
Matthew Cobb, University of Manchester (guest moderator) 
Michel Morange, IHPST, Université Paris I

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded on Sept 19, 2022.

Phoebus Levene Figure

Episode 5 of the DNA Papers examines the contributions of the organic chemist Phoebus Levene, who published a corpus of some 200 papers on the subject over a period of four decades, during which he made discoveries about the constituents of, and developed his ideas about the structure of, DNA. Among other things, he was the first person to correctly identify the sugar components of the nucleic acids: d-ribose  in RNA and d-2-deoxyribose in DNA. But these contributions have often been overlooked, and Levene is unfortunately more likely to be remembered in a negative light for something called the tetranucleotide hypothesis, which many believe hampered the progress of understanding the role of DNA.

Here to talk about Levene’s contributions to nucleic acid chemistry, and offer some perspective about the tetranucleotide hypothesis are:

Pnina Abir-Am, Brandeis University
Pedro Bernal, Rollins College
Mark Lorch, University of Hull

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded on Feb 13, 2023.

The sixth installment of this podcast series introduces a brand new player into the story of DNA: a technique from physics called X-ray crystallography. This technique would eventually play a key role in unlocking the secrets of DNA structure, but this 1938 paper by Leeds-based scientists William Astbury and Florence Bell marks the first instance of anyone attempting to use X-rays for the visualization of the nucleic acids. It is also the first paper in this series where the main contributor to the work was a woman.

Sharing their insights about the significance of the “X-Ray Study of Thymonucleic Acid” which was published in the prestigious journal Nature (v. 141: 747-748), are:

Manju Bansal, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
Kersten Hall, University of Leeds
Matthew Meselson, Harvard University
Jan Witkowski, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded on April 4, 2023.

The seventh episode of the DNA Papers is the central one in this podcast series, not only because it marks the halfway point of the podcast, but also, more so, because the paper discussed is at the center of the history of all twentieth century biology.  Written by a trio of microbiologists at the Rockefeller University in New York City, this paper without saying so in actual words, represents the first publication to offer evidence that DNA (though not yet known by that name) is the stuff that makes up genes:
Avery, Oswald T., Colin M. MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty. “Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types: Induction of Transformation by a Desoxyribonucleic Acid Fraction Isolated from Pneumococcus Type III.” The Journal of Experimental Medicine 79, no. 2 (1944): 137–58.
Joining the discussion of this historic paper are the following expert commentators:
Matthew Cobb, University of Manchester
Ute Deichmann, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Geoffrey Montgomery, Independent Science Writer, New York City
See also a collection of Resources.
Closed captioning available on YouTube.
Recorded on April 28, 2023.

Jan Witkowski(r) with Maclyn McCarty(l), 1999.
Image courtesy of Jan Witkowski.

In Episode 8 of the DNA papers, we discuss the papers that directly followed up the discovery of the 1944 paper from episode 7.  These papers, which have received little attention in histories of DNA, describe the purification and experimental use of an enzyme, desoxyribonuclease, or DNase, which specifically destroys DNA. By showing how the transforming principle is inactivated by this enzyme alone and not by RNA- or protein-degrading enzymes- the DNase experiments left “little doubt” that DNA is the chemical substance responsible for the transformation of bacterial types.


Papers discussed include:

  1. McCarty, Maclyn. 1946. “Purification and Properties of Desoxyribonuclease Isolated from Beef Pancreas.” The Journal of General Physiology 29 (3): 123–39.
  2. McCarty, Maclyn, and O.T. Avery. 1946. “Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types. II. Effect of Desoxyribonuclease on the Biological Activity of the Transforming Substance.” Journal of Experimental Medicine 83: 89–96.

Returning to the podcast series to share their thoughts on the place of these experiments in DNA history are:

Mark Lorch, University of Hull
Geoffrey Montgomery, Independent Science Writer
Michel Morange, IHPST, Université Paris I
Jan Witkowski, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded on June 22, 2023.


Erwin Chargaff, 1999.
Image courtesy of Jan Witkowski.


Episode 9 of the DNA Papers discusses a set of papers by the first scientist who made a sustained effort into uncovering the secret behind specificity of nucleic acids. The principle author, Erwin Chargaff, a European-American biochemist from Columbia University in New York, determined that the relative rations of the four nucleotide bases—A, T, G and C—were not present in all DNA in equal amounts as widely assumed, but rather, that they varied in proportion from one to another, with the amount of the A and G bases being equal to the T and C bases respectively. Furthermore, he also demonstrated that the ratio of these amounts was specific and consistent for a given species. He first laid out his vision for determining the role of nucleic acids in 1947, and over the next decade or so, proceeded to probe the finer details of DNA chemistry with the then state-of-the art innovations in techniques such as chromatography and UV spectroscopy.

Papers discussed include:

  1. Chargaff, Erwin. “On the Nucleoproteins and Nucleic Acids of Microorganisms.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 12 (January 1, 1947): 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1947.012.01.006.
  2. Vischer, Ernst, and Erwin Chargaff. “The Separation and Quantitative Estimation of Purines and Pyrimidines in Minute Amounts.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 176 (1948): 703–14.
  3. Chargaff, Erwin. “Chemical Specificity of Nucleic Acids and Mechanism of Their Enzymatic Degradation.” Experientia 6, no. 6 (June 15, 1950): 201–9.

Joining us to illuminate the role of Chargaff and his experiments in the history of DNA are:

Pnina Abir-Am, Brandeis University
Kersten Hall, University of Leeds
Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded on August 9, 2023.

Harriet Ephrussi-Taylor & Rollin Hotchkiss at 1947 symposium
Image courtesy of CSHL Library and Archives.


The tenth episode of the DNA papers podcast brings to light some of the lesser discussed papers in the history of DNA that were instrumental in confirming its role in effecting genetic transformation. Both papers discussed in this episode were first presented at the 1951 Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology; the first by a geneticist, and the second by a chemist, who were responsible for maintaining the continuity of work on bacterial transformation in Avery’s laboratory. These two papers provided important corroboration for the 1946 implication that the nucleic acid—DNA—of pneumococcus might be able to transform a variety of other bacterial traits besides their capsules and virulence.


Ephrussi-Taylor, Harriett. “Genetic Aspects of Transformations of Pneumococci.” In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 16:445–56. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1951.

Hotchkiss, Rollin D. “Transfer of Penicillin Resistance in Pneumococci by the Desoxyribonucleate Derived from Resistant Cultures.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 16 (January 1, 1951): 457–61. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1951.016.01.032.


Here to share their insights on these papers are:

Eleonora Cresto, National Council for Scientific and Technical Research, Buenos Aires
Geoffrey Montgomery, Independent Science Writer
Michel Morange, IHPST, Université Paris I,
Jan Witkowski, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded on Sept 19, 2023.

Hershey and Chase and a Waring blender of the type used in the experiment. Both images are Courtesy Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories

Alfred Hershey, Martha Chase and a Waring blender
Image courtesy of CSHL Library and Archives

In episode 11 of The DNA Papers we revisit a paper describing a famous experiment performed by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase which combined the atomic-age tools of radioisotopes with an ordinary kitchen blender to show that DNA alone, and not protein, was the carrier of hereditary information:

Hershey, Alfred D., and Martha Chase. “Independent Functions of Viral Protein and Nucleic Acid in Growth of Bacteriophage.” The Journal of General Physiology 36, no. 1 (1952): 39–56.

By using radioisotopes to separately label the DNA and protein components of a bacterial virus and demonstrating DNA’s central role in the earliest stages of viral replication inside a bacterial cell, Hershey and Chase’s 1952 paper provided powerful evidence about the chemical nature of the gene, and gained a well-deserved place among the classics in the history of DNA science. Here to share their ideas and opinions about the history and significance of this paper are:

Angela Creager, Princeton University
Geoffrey Montgomery, Independent Science Writer
William Summers, Yale University

See also a collection of Resources.

Closed captioning available on YouTube.

Recorded on Oct 24, 2023.

Episode 12 of the DNA Papers, is the first of a two-parter, which centers on papers published about the now iconic double helix structure of the DNA molecule. This episode features three publications, all published in the journal Nature, which represent the work of scientists working at King’s College London,  whose X-ray crystallographic work provided some of the crucial data that supported the new double helix model.
  • Wilkins, Maurice Hugh Frederick, Alec R. Stokes, and Herbert R. Wilson. “Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: Molecular Structure of Deoxypentose Nucleic Acids.” Nature 171, no. 4356 (1953): 738–40.
  • Franklin, Rosalind E., and Raymond G. Gosling. “Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate.” Nature 171, no. 4356 (1953): 740–41.
  • Franklin, Rosalind E., and Raymond G. Gosling. “Evidence for 2-Chain Helix in Crystalline Structure of Sodium Deoxyribonucleate.” Nature 172 (1953): 156–57.
Tune in to listen to our panel of experts in a lively and informative conversation about the place of these papers in the history of our understanding of DNA: 
Soraya de Chadarevian, University of California, Los Angeles
Elspeth Garman, Oxford University
Kersten Hall, University of Leeds
Jan Witkowski, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
See also a collection of Resources.
Recorded on Nov. 6, 2023.

DNA model built by Crick and Watson in 1953, on display in the National Science Museum of London.

DNA model built by Crick and Watson in 1953
on display in the National Science Museum of London
Wikimedia Commons

Rounding out the story begun in the previous installment, episode 13 of the DNA Papers centers on the publications in which the double helical structure for DNA was proposed, detailed, and its various implications speculated upon. It features four papers, all by Watson and Crick from Cambridge. Together these papers not only proposed that DNA’s three dimensional structure was a double-stranded helix, but also described the antiparallel and complementary nature of its two component strands and the specific pairing of  the component nucleotide bases, namely,  the purines, A and G, with the  pyrimidines T and C respectively. The papers also discussed the implications of these features for the fundamental functions of DNA.

Watson, J. D., and F. H. C. Crick. “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid.” Nature 171, no. 4356 (1953): 737–38.

Watson, James D., and Francis H. C. Crick. “The Structure of DNA.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 18 (1953): 123–31.

Watson, J. D., and F. H. C. Crick. “Genetical Implications of the Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid.” Nature 171, no. 4361 (May 30, 1953): 964–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/171964b0.

Crick, Francis HC, and James D. Watson. “The Complementary Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 223, no. 1152 (1954): 80–96.

Here to share their insights into the DNA double helix and place the discovery in their proper and well-deserved historical context are our distinguished guests:

Soraya de Chadarevian, University of California, Los Angeles
Matthew Cobb, University of Manchester
Nathaniel Comfort, Johns Hopkins University
Georgina Ferry

See also a collection of Resources.

Recorded on Dec. 11, 2023.

Insights from the Collections

The Consortium's collections provide many opportunities to learn more about the history of genetic science. 

Our cross-institutional search tool allows researchers to investigate materials across multiple institutions from a single interface. With millions of catalog records of rare books and manuscripts and thousands of finding aids, the Consortium's search hub offers scholars and the public the ability to identify and locate relevant materials.

Search the Consortium search hub.


Selected Bibliography



Though by no means a comprehensive list, here are some suggestions:
Hayes, W. 1960. “DNA and Biological Research.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 53 (8): 620–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/003591576005300808.
Pollock, M. R. 1970. “The Discovery of DNA: An Ironic Tale of Chance, Prejudice and Insight.” Journal of General Microbiology 63: 1–20.
Portugal, Franklin H., and Jack S. Cohen. A Century of DNA: A History of the Discovery of the Structure and Function of the Genetic Substance. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1977.
Judson, H. F. The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology. Simon and Schuster, 1979.
Olby, Robert Cecil. The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA. Courier Dover Publications, 1994.
Lagerkvist, Ulf. DNA Pioneers and Their Legacy. Yale University Press New Haven, CT, 1998.
Nelkin, Dorothy, and M. Susan Lindee. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon  [With a New Preface and Conclusion]. University of Michigan Press, 2004.
Altman, Sidney. “Masters of DNA.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, no. 15 (April 15, 2005): 14361–65. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.X400012200.
Williams, Gareth. Unravelling the Double Helix: The Lost Heroes of DNA. Hachette UK, 2019.
Morange, Michel. 2020. The Black Box of Biology: A History of the Molecular Revolution. Translated by Matthew Cobb. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674281363

Episode 1

Greenstein, Jesse P. 1943. “Friedrich Miescher, 1844-1895.” The Scientific Monthly 57 (6): 523–32.
Buess, Heinrich. 1953. “Joh. Friedrich Miescher and the Contribution of Basle Physicians to the Biology of the Nineteenth Century.” The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 25 (4): 250–61.
Mirsky, Alfred E. 1968. “The Discovery of DNA.” Scientific American 218 (6): 78–90.
Olby, Robert. 1969. “Cell Chemistry in Miescher’s Day.” Medical History 13 (4): 377–82.
James, J. 1970. “Miescher’s Discoveries of 1869: A Centenary of Nuclear Chemistry.” Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry 18 (3): 217–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/18.3.217.
Dahm, Ralf. 2005. “Friedrich Miescher and the Discovery of DNA.” Developmental Biology 278 (2): 274–88.
Dahm, Ralf. 2008. “Discovering DNA: Friedrich Miescher and the Early Years of Nucleic Acid Research.” Human Genetics 122 (6): 565–81.
Dahm, Ralf. 2008. “The First Discovery of DNA.” American Scientist 96 (4): 320–27.
Dahm, Ralf. 2010. “A Link in the Chain: Friedrich Miescher (1844-1895).” Karger Gazette, 3
Dahm, Ralf. 2010. “From Discovering to Understanding: Friedrich Miescher’s Attempts to Uncover the Function of DNA.” EMBO Reports 11 (3): 153–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.14.
Dahm, Ralf. 2021. “Isolating the Instructions for Life.” American Scientist 109: 134–35.
Dahm, Ralf, and Mita Banerjee. 2019. “How We Forgot Who Discovered DNA: Why It Matters How You Communicate Your Results.” BioEssays 41 (4): 1900029.
Lamm, Ehud, Oren Harman, and Sophie Juliane Veigl. 2020. “Before Watson and Crick in 1953 Came Friedrich Miescher in 1869.” Genetics 215 (2): 291–96. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.120.303195.
Veigl, Sophie Juliane, Oren Harman, and Ehud Lamm. 2020. “Friedrich Miescher’s Discovery in the Historiography of Genetics: From Contamination to Confusion, from Nuclein to DNA.” Journal of the History of Biology 53 (3): 451–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-020-09608-3.
Hall, Kersten, and Neeraja Sankaran. 2021. “DNA Translated: Friedrich Miescher’s Discovery of Nuclein in Its Original Context.” The British Journal for the History of Science 54 (1): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000708742000062X.

Episode 2

Kossel, Albrecht. “The Chemical Composition of the Cell.” The Harvey Lectures 7 (1912): 33–51.
Kossel, Albrecht. “Nobel Lecture: The Chemical Composition of the Cell Nucleus.” NobelPrize.org, December 12, 1910. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1910/kossel/lecture/.
Abir-Am, Pnina. Review of A Century of DNA: A History of the Discovery of the Structure and Function of the Genetic Substance, by Franklin H. Portugal and Jack S. Cohen. Isis 69, no. 3 (1978): 449–50.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. “A Short History of Molecular Biology.” History and Philosophy of Science and Technology 2 (2010): 1–31.
Framm, Edith, and Joachim Framm. Albrecht Kossel und die DNA: Ein Nobelpreisträger aus Mecklenburg [Albrecht Kossel and DNA: A Nobel Laureate from Mecklenburg]. Wismar, 2019.
Lorch, Mark. Biochemistry: A Very Short Introduction. Very Short Introductions. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Framm, Edith, and Joachim Framm. 2022. “Albrecht Kossel Und Die Nukleinbasen [Abrecht Kossel and the nucleobases],” Chemie in Unserer Zeit 56 (6): 372–77.

Episode 3

Mendel, Gregor. 1865. “Experiments in Plant Hybridization.” Presented at the Brünn Natural History Society, Brünn. http://old.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/gm-65-a.pdf.
Boveri, Theodor. 1904. Ergebnisse Über Die Konstitution Der Chromatischen Substanz Des Zelkerns [Results on the constitution of the chromatin substance of the cell’s nucleus] Jena: Fisher.
Smocovitis, V. B. 1992. “Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 25 (1): 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01947504.
Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty. 1997. “G. Ledyard Stebbins, Jr. and the Evolutionary Synthesis (1924-1950).” American Journal of Botany 84 (12): 1625–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446460.
Martins, L.A.-C.P. 1999. “Did Sutton and Boveri Propose the So-Called Sutton-Boveri Chromosome Hypothesis?” Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 (2): 261–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47571999000200022.
Crow E. W. and J. F. Crow 2002 "Perspectives 100 years ago: Walter Sutton and the chromosome theory of heredity." Genetics 160: 1-4.
Tagarelli, Antonio, Anna Piro, Paolo Lagonia, and Giuseppe Tagarelli. 2003. “Walter Stanborough Sutton: A Hundred Years after the Chromosomal Theory of Heredity.” Chromosoma 112: 1–5.
Hegreness, Matthew, and Matthew Meselson. 2007. “What Did Sutton See?: Thirty Years of Confusion Over the Chromosomal Basis of Mendelism.” Genetics 176 (4): 1939–44. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.79723.
Satzinger, Helga. 2008. “Theodor and Marcella Boveri: Chromosomes and Cytoplasm in Heredity and Development.” Nature Reviews Genetics 9 (3): 231–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2311.
Mahadevan, S. 2009. “Walter Sutton and the Chromosome Theory of Heredity.” Resonance, 312–15.
Deichmann, Ute. 2015. “Chromatin: Its History, Current Research, and the Seminal Researchers and Their Philosophy.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 58 (2): 143–64. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2015.0024.
Kasbekar, D. P. 2016. “History and Development of Genetics Research in India: Three Case Studies.” Indian Journal of History of Science 51 (2.2). https://doi.org/10.16943/ijhs/2016/v51i2.2/48456

Episode 4

Griffith, Fred. 1921. “Serological Types of Pneumococci in Lobar Pneumonia: A Study of 100 Cases.” The Lancet 198 (5109): 226–28.
Griffith, Fred. 1923. “The Influence of Immune Serum on the Biological Properties of Pneumococci.” Reports of the Local Government Board on Public Health and Medical Subjects, no. 18: 1–13.
Griffith, Fred. 1926. “Types of Haemolytic Streptococci in Relation to Scarlet Fever.” Epidemiology and Infection 25 (4): 385–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022172400017502.
Arkwright, J. A. 1929. “Bradshaw Lecture on the Virulence of the Microorganism in Infective Disease.” The Lancet, Originally published as Volume 2, Issue 5541, 214 (5541): 963–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)09687-8.
Arkwright, J. A. 1930. “Variation.” In A System of Bacteriology in Relation to Medicine, 1:311–74. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Lederberg, J. 1949. “Bacterial Variation.” Annual Reviews in Microbiology 3 (1): 1–22.
Lederberg, Joshua. 1956. “Genetic Transduction.” American Scientist 44 (3): 264–80.
Hayes, W. 1966a. “Genetic Transformation: A Retrospective Appreciation First Griffith Memorial Lecture.” Microbiology 45 (3): 385–97.
Hayes, W. 1966b. “The Discovery of Pneumococcal Type Transformation: An Appreciation.” The Journal of Hygiene 64 (2): 177–84.
Downie, A. W. 1972. “Pneumococcal Transformation-A Backward View Fourth Griffith Memorial Lecture.” Microbiology 73 (1): 1–11.
Baxby, Derrick. 1989. “The Significance of Pneumococcal Type Transformation in the History of Molecular Biology and Genetics.” Journal of Biological Education 23 (3): 213–17.
Ackert, Lloyd. 2003. “Microbial Musings: A History of Microbiology (Review), by Debra Jan Bibel.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 77 (2): 466–67. https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2003.0048.
Ackert, Lloyd. 2007. “René Dubos, Friend of the Good Earth: Microbiologist, Medical Scientist, Environmentalist (Review).” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 81 (3): 676–77. https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2007.0060.
Moxon, E. Richard. 2009. “Bacterial Variation, Virulence and Vaccines.” Microbiology 155 (4): 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.024877-0.
Ackert, Lloyd. 2012. Sergei Vinogradskii and the Cycle of Life: From the Thermodynamics of Life to Ecological Microbiology, 1850-1950. Springer.
Eichmann, Klaus, and Richard M. Krause. 2013. “Fred Neufeld and Pneumococcal Serotypes: Foundations for the Discovery of the Transforming Principle.” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 70 (13): 2225–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1351-z.
Méthot, Pierre-Olivier. “Bacterial Transformation and the Origins of Epidemics in the Interwar Period: The Epidemiological Significance of Fred Griffith’s ‘Transforming Experiment.’” Journal of the History of Biology 49, no. 2 (2016): 311–58.
Morange, Michel. “The Historiography of Molecular Biology.” In Handbook of the Historiography of Biology, edited by Michael Dietrich, Mark Borrello, and Oren Harman, 1–20. Historiographies of Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74456-8_11-1

Episode 5

Levene, P. A. 1909. “Über Die Hefenucleinsaure.” Biochem. Zschr. 17: 120–31.
Levene, P. A. 1910. “On the Biochemistry of Nucleic Acids.” Journal of the American Chemical Society 32 (2): 231–40. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01920a010.
Levene, P.A., and W.A. Jacobs. 1912. “On the Structure of Thymus Nucleic Acid.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 12 (3): 411–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)88677-X.
Levene, P. A. 1919. “The Structure of Yeast Nucleic Acid IV: Ammonia Hydrolysis.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 40: 415–24.
Levene, P. A., L. A. Mikeska, and T. Mori. 1930. “On the Carbohydrate of Thymonucleic Acid.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 85 (3): 785–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)76947-0.
Levene, Phoebus Aaron, and Lawrence Wade Bass. 1931. Nucleic Acids. Chemical Catalog Company New York.
Bass, Lawrence W. 1940. “Phoebus Aaron Theodor Levene 1869-1940.” Science 92 (2392): 392–95. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.92.2392.392.
Van Slyke, Donald Dexter, and Walter Abraham Jacobs. 1944. “Biographical Memoir of Phoebus Aaron Theodor Levene, 1869-1940.” Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 23: 75–126.
Olby, RC. 1979. “The Significance of the Macromolecules in the Historiography of Molecular Biology.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 1 (2): 185–96.
Hunter, Graeme K. 1999. “Phoebus Levene and the Tetranucleotide Structure of Nucleic Acids.” Ambix 46 (2): 73–103. https://doi.org/10.1179/amb.1999.46.2.73.
Simoni, Robert D., Robert L. Hill, and Martha Vaughan. 2002. “The Structure of Nucleic Acids and Many Other Natural Products: Phoebus Aaron Levene.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 (22): e11–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(20)85086-8.
Bernal, Pedro J. 2006. “From ‘Greasy Chemistry’ to ‘Macromolecule’: Thoughts on the Historical Development of the Concept of a Macromolecule.” Journal of Chemical Education 83 (6): 870. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p870.
Hargittai, István. 2009. “The Tetranucleotide Hypothesis: A Centennial.” Structural Chemistry 20 (5): 753–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-009-9497-x.
Frixione, Eugenio, and Lourdes Ruiz-Zamarripa. 2019. “The ‘Scientific Catastrophe’ in Nucleic Acids Research That Boosted Molecular Biology.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 294 (7): 2249–55. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.CL119.007397.

Episode 6

Astbury, William T., and Florence O. Bell. “Some Recent Developments in the X-Ray Study of Proteins and Related Structures.” In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 6:109–21. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1938.
Bell, Florence Ogilvy. “X-Ray and Related Studies of the Structure of the Proteins and Nucleic Acids.” PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, 1939.
Astbury, William T. “Protein and Virus Studies in Relation to the Problem of the Gene.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Genetics. Edinburgh, 49–51, 1939.
Astbury, W.T. “Adventures in Molecular Biology.” The Harvey Lectures 46 (1950): 3–44.
Witkowski, Jan. “Fifty Years on: Molecular Biology’s Hall of Fame.” Trends in Biotechnology 6, no. 10 (1988): 234–43.
Davies, Mansel. “W.T. Astbury, Rosie Franklin, and DNA: A Memoir.” Annals of Science 47, no. 6 (1990): 607–18.
Ghosh, Anirban, and Manju Bansal. “A Glossary of DNA Structures from A to Z.” Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 59, no. 4 (April 1, 2003): 620–26. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444903003251.
Meselson, Matthew. “Explorations in the Land of DNA and Beyond.” Nature Medicine 10, no. 10 (October 2004): 1034–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1004-1034.
Witkowski, Jan A. 2007. “J. D. Bernal: The Sage of Science.” The FASEB Journal 21 (2): 302–4. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-0202ufm.
McGregor, Hugh C. J., and Richard B. Gunderman. “X-Ray Crystallography and the Elucidation of the Structure of DNA.” American Journal of Roentgenology 196, no. 6 (June 2011): W689–92. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5479.
Hall, Kersten. “William Astbury and the Biological Significance of Nucleic Acids, 1938–1951.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (June 2011): 119–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.018.
Thomas, John Meurig. “The Birth of X-Ray Crystallography.” Nature 491, no. 7423 (November 2012): 186–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/491186a.
Hall, Kersten T. The Man in the Monkeynut Coat: William Astbury and the Forgotten Road to the Double-Helix. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Witkowksi, J. A. “Winding Road to DNA.” Nature 568 (2019): 308.
Hall, Kersten. “Florence Bell—the ‘Housewife’ with X-Ray Vision.” Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, February 24, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2020.0064.

Episode 7

Hotchkiss, R. D. 1953. “The Genetic Chemistry of the Pneumococcal Transformations.” Harvey Lectures 49: 124–44.
Mirsky, Alfred E. 1953. “The Chemistry of Heredity.” Scientific American 188 (2): 47–57.
Dubos, R. J. 1956. “Oswald Theodore Avery. 1877-1955.” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 2 (November): 35–48.
Hotchkiss, R. D. 1965. “Oswald T. Avery: 1877-1955.” Genetics 51 (1): 1–10.
Hotchkiss, Rollin D. 1966. “Gene, Transforming Principle, and DNA.” In Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology, 180–200.
Coburn, Alvin F. 1969. “Oswald Theodore Avery and DNA.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 12 (4): 623–30. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1969.0002.
Wyatt, Herbert V. 1972. “When Does Information Become Knowledge.” Nature 235 (5333): 86–89.
Lederberg, Joshua. 1972. “Reply to H. V. Wyatt.” Nature 239: 234.
Olby, Robert. 1972. “Avery in Retrospect.” Nature 239 (5370): 295–96. 
Pirie, N. W. 1972. “Avery in Retrospect.” Nature 240 (5383): 572.
McCarty, Maclyn. 1980. “Reminiscences of the Early Days of Transformation.” Annual Review of Genetics 14 (1): 1–15. 
Diamond Jr, Arthur M. 1982. “Avery’s" Neurotic Reluctance".” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 26 (1): 137–50.
Bendiner, Elmer. 1982. “Avery: Making Sense of A ‘Stupid Tetranucleotide.’” Hospital Practice 17 (10): 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1982.11702401.
Thomas, Lewis. 1984. “Oswald Avery and the Cascade of Surprises.” Technology in Society 6 (1): 37–40.
Vigue, Charles L. 1984. “Oswald Avery and DNA.” The American Biology Teacher 46 (4): 207–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/4447817. 
McCarty, Maclyn. “On the Unexpected Fruits of Mission-Oriented Research.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 128, no. 1 (1984): 20–26.
Russell, N. 1988. “Oswald Avery and the Origin of Molecular Biology.” British Journal for the History of Science 21 (71 Pt 4): 393–400.
Amsterdamska, Olga. 1993. “From Pneumonia to DNA: The Research Career of Oswald T. Avery.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 24 (1): 1–40.
Lederberg, Joshua. 1994. “The Transformation of Genetics by DNA: An Anniversary Celebration of Avery, MacLeod and McCarty (1944).” Genetics 136 (2): 423–26.
McCarty, Maclyn. 1994. “A Retrospective Look: How We Identified the Pneumococcal Transforming Substance as DNA.” Journal of Experimental Medicine 179: 385–94.
Bearn, Alexander G. 1996. “Oswald T. Avery and the Copley Medal of the Royal Society.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 39 (4): 550–54.
Austrian, Robert. 1999. “Oswald T. Avery: The Wizard of York Avenue.” The American Journal of Medicine 107 (1): 7–11.
Reichard, Peter. 2002. “Osvald T. Avery and the Nobel Prize in Medicine.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 (16): 13355–62. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R200002200
Deichmann, U. 2004. “Early Responses to Avery et al.’s Paper on DNA as Hereditary Material.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 34 (2): 207–32.
Ghose, Tarunendu. 2004. “Oswald Avery: The Professor, DNA, and the Nobel Prize That Eluded Him.” Canadian Bulletin of Medical History 21 (1): 135–44.
Cresto, Eleonora. 2008. “In Search of the Best Explanation about the Nature of the Gene: Avery on Pneumococcal Transformation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (1): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.12.012.
Deichmann, Ute. 2009. “Challenging the Protein Dogma of the Gene: Oswald T. Avery, a Revolutionary Conservative.” In Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology, edited by Oren Harman and Michael Dietrich, 154–73. New Haven, Conn.; London: Yale University Press.
Portugal, Frank. 2010. “Oswald T. Avery: Nobel Laureate or Noble Luminary?” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4): 558–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2010.0014.
Cobb, Matthew. 2014. “Oswald Avery, DNA, and the Transformation of Biology.” Current Biology 24 (2): R55–60.
Cobb, Matthew. 2016. “A Speculative History of DNA: What If Oswald Avery Had Died in 1934?” PLoS Biology 14 (12): e2001197.
Montgomery, Geoffrey. 2019. “Discovering that genes are made of DNA.” https://www.rockefeller.edu/events-and-lectures/40062-discovering-genes-dna/

Episode 8

Dubos, René, and Oswald T. Avery. “Decomposition of the Capsular Polysaccharide of Pneumococcus Type II by a Bacterial Enzyme.” Journal of Experimental Medicine 54, no. 1 (July 1, 1931): 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.54.1.51.
McCarty, Maclyn. 1945. “Reversible Inactivation of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types.” The Journal of Experimental Medicine 81 (5): 501–14. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.81.5.501
McCarty, Maclyn. 1946. “Chemical Nature and Biological Specificity of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types.” Bacteriological Reviews 10 (1–2): 63–71.
Allfrey, V., and A. E. Mirsky. 1952. “Some Aspects of the Desoxyribonuclease Activities of Animal Tissues.” The Journal of General Physiology 36 (2): 227–41.
Hotchkiss, Rollin D. “(R)Evolution.” Concluding remarks presented at the Symposium on Genetic Recombination, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, April 21, 1954.
McCarty, Maclyn. 1985. The Transforming Principle: Discovering That Genes Are Made of DNA. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company. 
Brenner, Sydney. 1985. “The Rough and the Smooth.” Nature 317: 209–10.
Luria, Salvador E. 1986. Review of A Personal Account of the Epochal Discovery That Identified DNA as the Genetic Material, by Maclyn McCarty. Scientific American 254 (4): 24–32.
Strauss, Bernard S. “The Transforming Principle by Maclyn McCarty.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 29, no. 3 (1986): 478–81. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1986.0025.
Fantini, Bernardino. 1988. Review of Genes and DNA, by M. McCarty. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 10 (1): 145–51.
Montgomery, Geoff. May 13, 1996. Interview with Maclyn McCarty, Rockefeller University, New York.
Witkowski, Jan A. 1999. “Once upon a Time.” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 24: 462.
McCarty, M. 2003. “Discovering Genes Are Made of DNA.” Nature 421 (6921): 406.
Gotschlich, Emil C., and Vincent A. Fischetti. 2005. “The Career of Maclyn McCarty.” Journal of Experimental Medicine 201 (11): 1699–1707. 
Lederberg, Joshua, and Emil C. Gotschlich. 2005. “A Path to Discovery: The Career of Maclyn McCarty.” PLOS Biology 3 (10): e341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030341.
Prusiner, Stanley B., and Maclyn McCarty. 2006. “Discovering DNA Encodes Heredity and Prions Are Infectious Proteins.” Annual Review of Genetics 40: 25–45.\Witkowksi, J. A. 2019. “Winding Road to DNA.” Nature 568: 308.
Witkowksi, J. A. 2019. “Winding Road to DNA.” Nature 568: 308.
Episode 9

Chargaff, Erwin, and Ernst Vischer. “Nucleoproteins, Nucleic Acids, and Related Substances.” Annual Review of Biochemistry 17, no. 1 (1948): 201–26.
Hotchkiss, Rollin D. “The Quantitative Separation of Purines, Pyrimidines, and Nucleosides by Paper Chromatography.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 175, no. 1 (1948): 315–32.
Vischer, Ernst, and Erwin Chargaff. “The Composition of the Pentose Nucleic Acids of Yeast and Pancreas.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 176, no. 2 (1948): 715–34.
Chargaff, Erwin. “Chemical Specificity of Nucleic Acids and Mechanism of Their Enzymatic Degradation.” Experientia 6, no. 6 (June 15, 1950): 201–9.
Zamenhof, Stephen, and Erwin Chargaff. “Dissymmetry in Nucleotide Sequence of Desoxypentose Nucleic Acids.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 187, no. 1 (1950): 1–14.
Zamenhof, Stephen, George Brawerman, and Erwin Chargaff. “On the Desoxypentose Nucleic Acids from Several Microorganisms.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 9 (1952): 402–5.
Chargaff, Erwin. “Preface to a Grammar of Biology.” Science 172, no. 3984 (1971): 637–42.
Chargaff, Erwin. “A Few Remarks on the Impact of Biochemistry on Genetics.” Stadler Symposium 7 (1975): 9–14.
Donohue. “Fragments of Chargaff.” Nature 276 (1978): 133–35.
Chargaff, Erwin. “How Genetics Got a Chemical Education.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 325 (1979): 345–60.
Abir-Am, Pnina. “From Biochemistry to Molecular Biology: DNA and the Acculturated Journey of the Critic of Science Erwin Chargaff.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 2, no. 1 (1980): 3–60.
Judson, Horace Freeland. “Frederick Sanger, Erwin Chargaff, and the Metamorphosis of Specificity.” Gene 135, no. 1–2 (December 1993): 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90043-3.
Hotchkiss, Rollin D. “DNA in the Decade before the Double Helix.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 758, no. 1 (1995): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb24809.x.
Forsdyke, Donald R., and James R. Mortimer. “Chargaff’s Legacy.” Gene 261, no. 1 (December 30, 2000): 127–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00472-8.
Cohen, Seymour S. “Erwin Chargaff, 11 August 1905 · 20 June 2002: Science in a Chaotic Time.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 148, no. 2 (2004): 222–28.
Kresge, N., R. D Simoni, and R. L Hill. “Chargaff’s Rules: The Work of Erwin Chargaff.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, no. 24 (2005): e21.
Manchester, Keith L. “Historical Opinion: Erwin Chargaff and His ‘Rules’ for the Base Composition of DNA: Why Did He Fail to See the Possibility of Complementarity?” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 33, no. 2 (February 1, 2008): 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2007.10.009.
Volkov, R. A., and S. S. Rudenko. “War and World of Erwin Chargaff (Dedicated to 110th Anniversary of Birth).” Cytology and Genetics 50, no. 1 (January 1, 2016): 72–78. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452716010102.
Hall, Kersten. “‘In Praise of Wool’: The Development of Partition Chromatography and Its under-Appreciated Impact on Molecular Biology.” Endeavour 43, no. 4 (December 2019): 100708 (16 pages). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2020.100708.
Hargittai, Istvan. “Paradigms and Paradoxes: Complementarity in Chemical Structures—a Tribute to Erwin Chargaff.” Structural Chemistry 33, no. 4 (August 1, 2022): 1003–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-022-01915-1.
Episode 10

Austrian, Robert, and Colin M. MacLeod. “Acquisition of M Protein by Pneumococci through Transformation Reactions.” The Journal of Experimental Medicine 89, no. 4 (1948): 451–60.
Taylor, Harriett E. “Additive Effects of Certain Transforming Agents from Some Variants of Pneumococcus.” Journal of Experimental Medicine, n.d., 399–424.
Ephrussi-Taylor, Harriet. “Mutating Concepts of the Gene.” Journal of Heredity 43, no. 1 (January 1, 1952): 36. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a106255.
Austrian, Robert. “Bacterial Transformation Reactions.” Bacteriological Reviews 16, no. 1 (1952): 31–50.
Hotchkiss, R. D. “The Genetic Chemistry of the Pneumococcal Transformations.” Harvey Lectures 49 (1953-54): 124–44.
Ephrussi-Taylor, Harriett. “Current Status of Bacterial Transformations.” In Advances in Virus Research, 3:275–307. Elsevier, 1955.
Hotchkiss, Rollin D. “Bacterial Transformation.” Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 45, no. S2 (1955): 1–22.
Hotchkiss, Rollin D., and Esther Weiss. “Transformed Bacteria.” Scientific American, 1956.
Austrian, Robert. Life with the Pneumococcus: Notes from the Bedside, Laboratory, and Library. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv4t80zj.
Hamilton, L. D., R. K. Barclay, M. H. F. Wilkins, G. L. Brown, H. R. Wilson, D. A. Marvin, H. Ephrussi-Taylor, and N. S. Simmons. “Similarity of the Structure of DNA from a Variety of Sources.” The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 5, no. 3 (May 1, 1959): 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.5.3.397.
Hotchkiss, Rollin D. “The Identification of Nucleic Acids as Genetic Determinants.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 325, no. 1 (1979): 321–44.
Hotchkiss, Rollin D. “DNA in the Decade before the Double Helix.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 758, no. 1 (1995): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb24809.x.
Hotchkiss, Rollin D. “Gene, Transforming Principle, and DNA.” In Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology, 180–200, 1966.
Dawes, Heather. “The Quiet Revolution.” Current Biology 14, no. 15 (2004): R605–7.
Witkin, Evelyn M. “Remembering Rollin Hotchkiss (1911–2004).” Genetics 170, no. 4 (2005): 1443–47.
Cresto, Eleonora. “How DNA Became an Important Molecule Controversies at the Origins of Molecular Biology.” In Controversy Spaces: A Model of Scientific and Philosophical Change, 10:135–62, 2011. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6a9xAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA135&ots=BoyPxQL0eu&sig=vzzJaIrtctlqTTLmnT_UUdBjNjU.

Episode 11

Maaløe, Ole, and James D. Watson. “The Transfer of Radioactive Phosphorus from Parental to Progeny Phage.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 37, no. 8 (1951): 507–13.
Hershey, A. D. “Intracellular Phages in the Reproductive Cycle of Bacteriophage T2.” Annales de l’Institut Pasteur 84, no. 1 (1953): 99–111.
Hershey, A. D. “Idiosyncrasies of DNA Structure.” Nobel Lecture presented at the Nobel Prize Award Ceremony, Stockholm, Sweden, December 12, 1969. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.168.3938.1425.
Witkowski, Jan, ed. “The Hershey-Chase Experiment.” In Illuminating Life: Selected Papers from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1903-1969, 201–3. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1999.
Stahl, Franklin W., and A. D. Hershey, eds. We Can Sleep Later: Alfred D. Hershey and the Origins of Molecular Biology. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Old Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2000.
Hodgkin, Jonathan. “Hershey and His Heaven.” Nature Cell Biology 3, no. 3 (March 2001): E77–E77. https://doi.org/10.1038/35060155.
Creager, Angela NH. “Hershey Heaven.” Nature Structural Biology 8, no. 1 (2001): 18–19.
Dawson, Milly. “Martha Chase Dies.” Genome Biology 4, no. 1 (August 20, 2003): spotlight-20030820-01. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-spotlight-20030820-01.
Creager, A. N. H. “Phosphorus-32 in the Phage Group: Radioisotopes as Historical Tracers of Molecular Biology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (2009): 29–42.
Creager, Angela N. H. “A Chemical Reaction to the Historiography of Biology.” Ambix 64, no. 4 (October 2, 2017): 343–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00026980.2017.1412136.
Creager, Angela NH. Life Atomic: A History of Radioisotopes in Science and Medicine. University of Chicago Press, 2019.
Hernandez, Victoria. “The Hershey-Chase Experiments (1952), by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase.” In The Embryo Project Encyclopedia. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society., 2019. https://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/13109.

Episode 12

NobelPrize.org. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1962.” Accessed August 29, 2023. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1962/ceremony-speech/.
Wilkins, Maurice H. F. “Nobel lecture: The Molecular Configuration of Nucleic Acids.” Nobelprize.org, December 11, 1962. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/wilkins-lecture.pdf.
Klug, Aaron. “Rosalind Franklin and the Discovery of the Structure of DNA.” Nature 219, no. 5156 (1968): 808–10.
Klug, A. “Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix.” Nature 248, no. 5451 (April 1974): 787–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/248787a0.
Hussain, F. “Did Rosalind Franklin Deserve DNA Nobel Prize?” New Scientist 68 (1975): 470.
Manwell, Clyde, and C. M. Ann Baker. “Commentary: The Double Helix: Science and Myth in the Act of Creation.” BioScience 29, no. 12 (1979): 742–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1307669.
Johnson, Stephanie, and Thomas R. Mertens. “An Interview with Nobel Laureate Maurice Wilkins.” The American Biology Teacher 51, no. 3 (March 1, 1989): 151–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448881.
Maddox, Brenda. Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA. HarperCollins New York, 2002.
Wilkins, M. The Third Man of the Double Helix: The Autobiography of Maurice Wilkins. Oxford University Press, USA, 2003.
Elkin, Lynne Osman. “Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix.” Physics Today 56, no. 3 (2003): 42–48.
Selya, Rena. “Essay Review: Defined by DNA: The Intertwined Lives of James Watson and Rosalind Franklin.” Journal of the History of Biology 36, no. 3 (2003): 591–97.
Williams, Nigel. “Maurice Wilkins (1916–2004).” Current Science 14, no. 21 (2004): R906.
Gratzer, Walter. “Maurice Wilkins (1916–2004).” Nature 431, no. 7011 (October 2004): 922–922. https://doi.org/10.1038/431922a
Wright, Pearce. “Maurice H F Wilkins.” The Lancet 364, no. 9444 (October 23, 2004): 1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17258-9.
Arnott, Struther, T.W.B. Kibble, and Tim Shallice. “Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins. 15 December 1916 — 5 October 2004: Elected FRS 1959.” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 52 (January 2006): 455–78. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbm.2006.0031.
Gibbons, Michelle G. “Reassessing Discovery: Rosalind Franklin, Scientific Visualization, and the Structure of DNA.” Philosophy of Science 79 (2012): 63. https://doi.org/10.1086/663241.
Gosling, Raymond. “The Genesis of a Discovery: First Steps.” Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News 33, no. 7 (April 2013): 29–31, 45. https://doi.org/10.1089/gen.33.7.13.
Attar, Naomi. “Raymond Gosling: The Man Who Crystallized Genes.” Genome Biology 14, no. 4 (April 25, 2013): 402. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-402.
Cuevas, Jose, and Laurence E. Heglar. “Photography and the Discovery of the Double Helix Structure of DNA.” Philosophy of Photography 4, no. 2 (December 1, 2013): 163–80. https://doi.org/10.1386/pop.4.2.163_1.
Brooks-Bartlett, Jonathan C., and Elspeth F. Garman. “The Nobel Science: One Hundred Years of Crystallography.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 40, no. 3 (2015): 244–64.
Zwart, Hub. “The Third Man: Comparative Analysis of a Science Autobiography and a Cinema Classic as Windows into Post-War Life Sciences Research.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37, no. 4 (July 24, 2015): 382–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-015-0080-z.
Davis, Burtron H., and E. Thomas Strom. “Rosalind Franklin: Her Pathway to DNA.” In The Posthumous Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Volume 2. Ladies in Waiting for the Nobel Prize, 1311:265–82. ACS Symposium Series 1311. American Chemical Society, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2018-1311.ch011.
Danylova, T. V., and S. V. Komisarenko. “Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: James Watson, Francis Crick, Maurice Wilkins, Rosalind Franklin and the Birth of Molecular Biology.” Ukr Biochem J 92, no. 4 (2020): 154–65.
Garman, Elspeth F.  “Rosalind Franklin 1920–1958.” Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology 76, no. 7 (July 1, 2020): 698–701. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798320008827
Hall, Kersten T. “Fifty Pence Story? (With Thanks to Simon Armitage).” Newsletter of the History of Science Society 49, no. 4 (2020): 1–3.
Pederson, Thoru. “The Double Helix: ‘Photo 51’ Revisited.” The FASEB Journal 34, no. 2 (February 2020): 1923–27. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000119.
Harris, Peter J. F., and Irene Suarez-Martinez. “Rosalind Franklin, Carbon Scientist.” Carbon 171 (January 1, 2021): 289–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.09.022.
Episode 13

Watson, J. D., and O. Maaløe. “Nucleic Acid Transfer from Parental to Progeny Bacteriophage.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 10 (1953): 432–42.
Crick, Francis H. C. “Letter to Son, Michael,” March 19, 1953. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/v3ndr2ux.
Watson, James D. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New York: Atheneum, 1968.
Lwoff, André. Truth, truth and what is truth (about how the structure of DNA was discovered)?; Review of  The Double Helix by James D. Watson. Scientific American 219, no. 1 (1968): 133–38.
Crick, F. “The Double Helix: A Personal View.” Nature 248, no. 5451 (1974): 766–69.
Lederberg, Joshua. “What the Double Helix (1953) Has Meant for Basic Biomedical Science: A Personal Commentary.” JAMA 269, no. 15 (1993): 1981–85.
Crick, Francis. “Looking Backwards: A Birthday Card for the Double Helix.” Gene 135, no. 1 (1993): 15–18.
Perutz, Max F. “Co-Chairman’s Remarks: Before the Double Helix.” Gene 135, no. 1 (1993): 9–13.
Glickstein, Neil M. “‘The Double Helix’ Revisited.” The American Biology Teacher 57, no. 3 (1995): 146–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449951.
Watson, James. “The Double Helix 50 Years Later: Implications for Psychiatry.” American Journal of Psychiatry 160, no. 4 (April 2003): 614–614. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.614.
De Chadarevian, Soraya. “Portrait of a Discovery: Watson, Crick, and the Double Helix.” Isis 94, no. 1 (March 2003): 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1086/376100.
Strasser, Bruno J. “Who Cares about the Double Helix?” Nature 422, no. 6934 (2003): 803–4.
Chadarevian, Soraya de. “Relics, Replicas and Commemorations.” Endeavour 27, no. 2 (June 1, 2003): 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-9327(03)00060-7.
Bansal, Manju. “DNA Structure: Revisiting the Watson–Crick Double Helix.” Current Science 85, no. 11 (2003): 1556–63.
Olby, Robert. “Quiet Debut for the Double Helix.” Nature 421, no. 6921 (2003): 402–5.
Olby, Robert. “Why Celebrate the Golden Jubilee of the Double Helix?” Endeavour 27, no. 2 (2003): 80–84.
Gann, Alexander, and Jan Witkowski. “The Lost Correspondence of Francis Crick.” Nature 467, no. 7315 (September 2010): 519–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/467519a.
Gingras, Yves. “Revisiting the ‘Quiet Debut’ of the Double Helix: A Bibliometric and Methodological Note on the ‘Impact’ of Scientific Publications.” Journal of the History of Biology 43, no. 1 (February 2010): 159–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9183-2.
Watson, James D. The Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix. Edited by Alexander Gann and Jan Witkowski. Annotated edition. Simon & Schuster, 2012.
Gann, Alexander, and A Witkowski. “DNA: Archives Reveal Nobel Nominations.” Nature 496 (April 2013): 434.
Balaram, P. “The Double Helix: Sixty Years On.” Current Science 104, no. 9 (2013): 1127–28.
Kantha, Sachi Sri. “Citation Patterns of the Four Seminal DNA Double-Helix Model Papers by Watson and Crick in 1953–54.” Current Science 104, no. 9 (2013): 1237–39.
Cobb, Matthew, and Nathaniel Comfort. “What Watson and Crick Really Took from Franklin.” Nature 616 (April 2023): 657–60.